[Bigjob-users] Cannot access Redis from compute nodes on alamo.

[pradeep kumar Mantha]

Hi!
I am able to access c079 in the following way.


[pmantha at login1 ~]$ qsub -I -lnodes=1
qsub: waiting for job 136596.master1.cm.cluster to start
qsub: job 136596.master1.cm.cluster ready

[pmantha at c079 ~]$ ssh c079
Last login: Tue Jan 31 12:28:55 2012 from c080.cm.cluster


[pmantha at c079 ~]$ cd
/N/soft/SAGA/saga/1.6/gcc-4.1.2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/
[pmantha at c079 site-packages]$ ls -ltr
total 96
drwxr-xr-x 9 merzky users  4096 Nov 24 06:50 saga
-rw-r--r-- 1 merzky users  1779 Nov 24 06:51 site.pyc
-rw-r--r-- 1 merzky users  2362 Nov 24 06:51 site.py
drwxr-xr-x 9 merzky users  4096 Nov 24 06:51 BigJob-0.3.2-py2.7.egg
-rw-r--r-- 1 merzky users 37188 Nov 24 06:51 redis-2.2.4-py2.7.egg
drwxr-xr-x 4 merzky users  4096 Nov 24 06:51 virtualenv-1.6.4-py2.7.egg
-rw-r--r-- 1 merzky users 12888 Nov 24 06:51 threadpool-1.2.7-py2.7.egg
-rw-r--r-- 1 merzky users 13846 Nov 24 06:51 uuid-1.30-py2.7.egg
-rw-r--r-- 1 merzky users   314 Nov 24 06:51 easy-install.pth
[pmantha at c079 site-packages]$

thanks
pradeep


On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Andre Merzky <andremerzky at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Andre Luckow <aluckow at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Ole
> >
> >> If this is *not* the default case and only a fall-back solution, I
> strongly
> >> suggest that we make it the default case, otherwise we will keep on
> running
> >> into trouble like this! Change BigJob in that regard should be
> sufficiently
> >> easier than trying to keep versions consistent across n number of
> machines?
> >
> > It is the default case if no BigJob installation is found. In this
> > case BJ is found in the PYTHONPATH, thus, it is used. I think there
> > should be always a possibility for the user to override the default
> > behavior and that's what is done here.
> >
> > @AndreM: Could you please delete the old BJ from the node c079 on Alamo?
>
> How:
>
>  -bash-3.2$ ssh c079
>  Warning: Permanently added 'c079,10.141.0.79' (RSA) to the list of
> known hosts.
>  Connection closed by 10.141.0.79
>
> Is it possible to interactively connect there?  Why should that node
> have a different CSA installation than the head node?  I only install
> CSA on head nodes...
>
> Best, Andre.
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Andre
>
>
>
> --
> Nothing is ever easy...
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.cct.lsu.edu/pipermail/bigjob-users/attachments/20120131/7ceee36f/attachment.html